News archive 2002
7 December - MP backs our
campaign
Wealden
MP Charles Hendry threw his weight firmly behind the campaign
for a revived Wealden Line when he addressed our AGM at Uckfield
on 30 November. Warning that road congestion in Uckfield was now
even worse than it had been before the town's bypass was opened,
he sharply criticised the SRA for having grossly over-estimated
the costs of restoring the town's rail link to Lewes.
At the same time, Mr Hendry
paid generous tribute to the work of the campaign, reminding those
present that without its continuing work, reinstatement of the
route would now be impossible.
Turning to the future,
he stressed that if they wanted to see the route restored, local
people had to lobby their MPs - and act as their eyes and ears
to keep them in touch with the latest developments. He also looked
ahead to forthcoming meetings where he, his Lewes colleague Norman
Baker and county council representatives would be putting the
case for the Wealden Line to SRA chairman Richard Bowker.
Rounding off his remarks,
Mr Hendry concluded that with major housing development on the
way for the south east, local roads would simply be unable to
cope with the increased traffic. The only practical answer was
better public transport.
3 December - Uckfield to
Lewes in colour
Thanks to the generosity
of two of our supporters, we are now able to present a previously
unpublished selection of colour photographs showing the last days
of the Uckfield - Lewes line.
Although for many, these
pictures will make rather sad and frustrating viewing - so many
'if onlys' - they also serve to remind us what we are fighting
for!
30 November - Wealden MP
Charles Hendry addresses a well-attended AGM - full report soon!
17 October - SEERA plans
new study
The South East England
Regional Assembly (SEERA) is set to launch its own study on the
Wealden Line proposals. The news came at the 17 October meeting
of the Wealden Line Steering Group, where it was revealed that
SEERA has become increasingly dissatisfied with the SRA's strategy
for the route.
The work will be carried
out by George Hazel Transport Consultants, a widely respected
company in the field, who will be tasked with evaluating the route's
potential as a regional transport asset. The study will seek to
provide an economic case for the route's restoration to put before
the SRA and its political masters.
SEERA's move was warmly
welcomed by both East Sussex County Council and the Wealden Line
Campaign. Underlining the local authority's growing support for
the Wealden Line proposals, Councillor Tony Reid (Lead Member
Transport & Environment) promised that ESCC would now work
closely with SEERA, both to agree on the detailed objectives of
the study and even to provide financial assistance if necessary.
"SEERA's interest
in this project underlines what we have been saying for a long
time," said Wealden Line Campaign Director Brian Hart. "They
clearly share our view that it can benefit the whole region -
not just places like Uckfield and Crowborough."
26 September - Fears grow
over SRA
The Wealden Line Campaign
has expressed grave concern at reports from rail industry commentators
that the SRA has now run out of money. Sources suggest that the
government agency has exhausted its funds on the bungled West
Coast modernisation and on launching the Railtrack successor,
Network Rail. At the same time, it also appears that train operators
have been deprived of any say in improvements to the rail system.
In practical terms, this
seems likely to mean that projects like South Central's Arun Valley
upgrade, designed to create an 'alternative' Brighton main line
are now completely dead. It is also becoming clear that there
is no longer any hope of electrifying the Uckfield stump or ANY
other lines in the south east: third rail electrification is effectively
dead.
"Councillors, MPs and everybody who wants to see rail investment,"
said Campaign Director Brian Hart, "must now lower their
sights and work towards limited and readily achievable enhancements
to the network. 'Grand projects' are likely to be dismissed out
of hand."
"The SRA's latest
failure is a damning indictment of over five years of so-called
'New Labour' government," he added. "The party gained
power on the promise of creating a radically improved, 'integrated'
transport system; yet in office it has done no more for our crumbling
rail network than the failed Labour governments of the 1970s."
24 September - Campaign
meets South Central boss
Campaign Director Brian
Hart headed a Wealden Line Campaign delegation in talks with South
Central MD David Franks at his London headquarters. In the course
of a one-hour meeting, a wide range of issues covering the Uckfield
line and its possible extension were covered.
Although, for reasons of
business confidentiality, not all of the content of the meeting
can be disclosed at this time, Mr Hart made the following points:
- South Central is hoping
to introduce an all-day Uckfield -London (Bridge) service with
the Turbostars, thus eliminating the inconvenient change of trains
at Oxted. This will be welcomed by everyone and we think this
will go a long way to reducing railheading to adjacent lines.
However, off-peak trains will continue to be poorly patronised
south of Oxted as the line still won't go anywhere. Despite all
that has been said, the SRA still refuses to seriously address
this problem.
- We presented South
Central with our costings for rebuilding the Wealden Line's 'missing
links' (see 7 August below) - and these were well received. They
will now be sent to the SRA, Railtrack, the RPC, MPs, local authorities
and other interested parties. These costings are the most accurate
figures ever produced on creating a restored Wealden Line and
prove that this major transport corridor could be revived for
the cost of a modest road scheme.
- It appears that the
order for the new class 170 'Turbostar' DMUs, much reported by
the railway press over the summer, has yet to be placed. This
delay is worrying and the uncertainty must soon be resolved,
as enough time has already been wasted.
- This is obviously a
difficult time for South Central, both because it is still waiting
to see if it will be successful even in gaining a new seven year
franchise and because the Roscos (the rolling stock companies)
are in the process of increasing their charges to the train operators.
29 August - SRA drops 20-year
South Central francise
In a surprise move, the
SRA has abandoned its plans to give train operator Govia a 20-year
franchise for the South Central network, stating that the new
agreement will be for "up to seven years" only. It had
been expected that the new franchise being negotiated with Govia
would run from the expiry of the original Connex franchise in
May 2003 until 2023.
The SRA claims that the
new, much shorter, franchise will still deliver "substantially
the same benefits as those originally planned for the 20-year
franchise". The reasons for the move were not immediately
clear, but it is in line with a recent trend away from long-term
franchises.
The full text of the SRA's
press release can be seen here.
7 August - Uckfield - Lewes:
for £25m
A new report for the Wealden
Line Campaign has put the cost of reinstating the railway from
Uckfield to Lewes at just £25m. The figure is based on a
single line to Hamsey and was calculated using current industry
costings supplied by AMEC Rail. In addition to track, signalling
and repairs to structures, generous allowances were also made
for land acquisition and clearence.
An enhancement to the basic
scheme, which would provide more operational flexibility by adding
a 2.25-mile loop between Uckfield and Isfield, would still give
a total cost of just £29m.
The campaign's chairman,
Simon Anderson, was quick to give the report a warm welcome. "This
is a robust set of costings," he said, "compiled by
an ex-Railtrack civil engineer. It proves that we can have a new
rail route from London to the south coast for the price of a couple
of miles of bypass. Combined with new trains that are already
on the way, it would be a big hit with travellers."
13 July - "No case"
for electrification says minister
Transport minister David
Jamieson has effectively ruled out electrification of the Uckfield
stump. In answer to a question from Wealden MP Charles Hendry,
he stated on 9 July that the SRA had advised him that there was
"currently no case" for electrification, the costs of
which would "far outweigh the benefits". Mr Jamieson
went on to note that "Equivalent passenger and operational
benefits" would be secured by new diesel units, for which
Govia would soon be placing an order.
Although the minister stated
that the SRA would carry out a study on electrification after
the South Central franchise had been running for five years, we
believe that as things stand, the conclusion will be the same.
Although some will be disappointed
by Mr Jamieson's announcement, we wholeheartedly welcome it. With
the (expensive) red herring of electrification eliminated, the
way is now clear for real progress on the only issue that matters:
reopening the closed sections of line.
12 July - New trains arrive
on our website
However quickly all parties
work towards a restored Wealden Line, one thing is now quite certain:
the CIG express stock that used to grace our site entrance will
now never serve the route. These trains, which first appeared
on BR's Southern Region in 1964, are all set to be scrapped under
HSE rules by the end of 2004 at the latest, well before even the
most optimistic date for reopening.
They are to be replaced
by a new fleet of 100-mph air conditioned trains, two of which
are seen under test at Polegate in our new 'cover photo'. The
first of these trains, in three-car form, will enter service on
the Seaford-West Coastway route in the late summer. Later on,
four-car units will begin to appear on the South Coast-London
routes.
It is a sobering thought
that had the Uckfield-Lewes line not been destroyed in 1969, these
excellent new trains would probably soon have been linking towns
like Uckfield, Crowborough with Brighton and Tunbridge Wells.
Apart from being a reminder
of what might have been, but for a short-sighted political decision,
the choice of a new electric train to front our site also underlines
our eventual goal of seeing the Wealden Line rebuilt as an integral
part of the South East's electrified rail network. But where we
differ from some of our critics is that we believe the Wealden
Line should be restored as a through route first, with electrification
flowing naturally from traffic growth.
By contrast, electrification
of the current Uckfield stub would be expensive - probbly costing
over £70m - but would yield no new travel opportunities
for the region nor give it any value as a diversionary route.
It would not offer quicker journeys or more comfort than the fleet
of new diesels which is already on the way. In the long run, it
may even hamper development of the route by entrenching a restrictive
track layout unable to cope with more than a twice-hourly service,
with only enough power for short trains.
Hardly, we think, a very
good return on the investment.
27 May - New online application
form
To make it easier than
ever to join the campaign, we have added a new quick to complete
application form that you can simply download from the "Join
us" page. Just
type in your details, print it off and pop it in the post with
your subscription!
13 May - Campaign adopts
new strategy
The Wealden Line Campaign
has dropped its insistence that the Wealden Line be reinstated
as an electrified route from the start. The campaign committee
unanimously decided that the priority has to be restoring a through-service
on the route - no matter what sort of traction is used.
Although the committee
wanted to see electric trains on the route eventually, they backed
Campaign Director Brian Hart's view that calling for immediate
electrification would make the scheme much harder to get off the
ground, thanks to much higher start-up costs.
"Given that the entire
10-mile Windemere branch was recently relayed with new track for
£6m," he said, "it's quite realistic to think
that without electrification, the Wealden Line could be restored
as a through-route for as little as £30m. Once the trains
are running again, the route will grow naturally."
"People around here
want through-trains now," said Mr Hart, "not in 10 years'
time. It's more important to get them running again than worry
about what type of train they are." The campaign's new stance
received early backing from the Uckfield Railway Line Parish Committee,
which met on 15 May and underlined the need for action now rather
than long-term projects which might never be completed.
29 March - Website moves
to new host
After Yahoo GeoCities imposed
unacceptable conditions on our continued use of its webspace,
we have moved to a new host. One benefit of this is that there
will be no more distracting pop-up ads on the site.
25 March - WLC puts its
case to East Sussex County Council
Campaign Director Brian
Hart put the case for a revived Wealden Line to Cabinet Member
Tony Reid in a "constructive" 2½-hour meeting
at Lewes. Mr Hart stressed the need for progress to be made in
re-establishing Wealden Line as a through route - even if it was
not initially electrified. Such a scheme, he said, would offer
"all the major benefits" of the more elaborate schemes
advocated in the past, but at a fraction of the cost.
Councillor Reid, who leads
the Transport and Environment committee, said that now funding
had been secured for the regeneration of Hastings, the council
would be focussing on the Seaford-Lewes-Tunbridge Wells corridor.
He believed a revived Wealden Line had an important role to play
in this.
23 March - Campaign to
rethink strategy
A major rethink of campaign
strategy has begun after a meeting that brought together transport
minister John Spellar, local Labour councillors and Campaign Director
Brian Hart. During the hour-long meeting in London on 7 March,
the group made a forceful case for reopening, but it soon became
clear that there was little or no prospect of government support
for the full Wealden Line scheme hitherto envisaged by the campaign.
However, prospects for
a revived diesel-operated network looked much brighter. Not only
could this be created more quickly and at substantially less cost,
but modern DMUs - Turbostars for example - would offer passengers
as good a service as the best electric trains.
Under the scheme now being
considered, funds that would have been used simply to electrify
the existing Uckfield stub (low speed, single track - little real
passenger benefit) could be used to rebuild the closed links.
The successful development of the Chiltern Line north of London
provides a working example of what such a revived service might
be like.
So, instead of the previous
aim of the campaign, which could be summarised as:
electrification
(of the Uckfield stub) - redoubling - full route reinstatement
the new order of priorities
would be:
basic reinstatement
- redoubling - electification
In the latter case, each
step would provide a solid foundation for the next one.
In the former case, electrification
of the present track layout - all that can now be hoped for -
would provide little more than a glorified reversing siding with
minimal incentive for traffic growth. Moreover, a lack of suitable
power supplies and the fact that most signalling on the line is
incompatible with electric traction would ensure very high costs.
Of course, the campaign
still recognises that the long term goal must remain a double-track
electrified system, with all the diversionary-route benefits this
would entail. But in the short term, there is a growing awareness
that this is a project that must learn to walk before it tries
to run.
2 March - Grove Junction
to return?
There are reports that
Railtrack plans to restore a short section of track between the
former Grove
Junction and the
site of Tunbridge Wells West as a reversing siding for Connex
trains terminating at Tunbridge Wells. Already it has carried
out some exploratory land clearance work between Cumberland Walk
and the junction site.
If the junction is indeed
restored, it will be an ironic twist of fate, as its elimination
(to save money on the Hastings line electrification) was one of
the key reasons that BR gave in 1982 for closing the Eridge -
Tunbridge Wells route.
25 February - New DMUs
on the cards
New DMUs could be brought
in to replace current Uckfield line trains, some of which are
now 45 years old. At a meeting of the Wealden Line Steering Committee
in Uckfield, South Central MD David Franks confirmed that his
company is actively considering Turbostar trains for the route
as an interim measure before electrification.
Although these trains would
certainly bring travel on the line up to date, unless double track
is restored there will be little opportunity for shorter journey
times. There is also a suspicion they might provide the SRA with
an excuse for letting electrification plans slip. After all, the
present class 205s and 207s were themselves introduced in 1962
as an "interim" solution prior to the then South Croydon
- Lewes route's electrification!
26 January - Coach Connex
buses axed
The
Connex-operated No 60 bus link has been axed after little more
than 18 months' operation. Contrary to earlier media reports,
there is no replacement service as such - just four additional
bus journeys in the evenings, supported by South Central for a
year's trial. Rail tickets will continue to be valid on these
services.
During the daytime, passengers
will have to use the existing Nos 28 and 729 services, which do
not directly serve either Uckfield or Lewes railway stations.
Although Uckfield bus station is only a short distance from the
railway station, bus stops at Lewes are far less convenient for
prospective rail travellers - especially if they have any luggage.
Expressing his frustration
at the news, Campaign Director Brian Hart said: "Despite
all John Prescott's promises, this is yet another demonstration
of what the government's 'integrated transport' policies mean
in practice. Needless to say, the hardest hit will be the young,
the disabled and the elderly."
17 January - SRA launches
a damp squib
The SRA's much-touted Strategic
Plan was finally published on 14 January, fully living up to the
campaign's low expectations. Those who had the time to wade through
its 110 turgid pages will have found little more than a collection
of old initiatives - many announced several years ago - dressed
up as new ones. Despite the increasingly worrying state of the
railways, there was no new money for investment.
One area in which the report
excelled was meaningless jargon. It positively abounded with phrases
like "supporting innovation","Incremental Output
Statements" and "establishing a new Rail Performance
Fund", assuring us that "existing franchise agreements
are delivered without viability reviews".
Predictably, there was
no mention of the Wealden Line scheme whatsoever and even the
references to other schemes in Sussex like the Arun Valley upgrade
and Ore-Ashford electrification looked dated; since the report
was written, both have been kicked into the long grass.
The Uckfield stump itself
was honoured with a mention, with electrification reaching something
called a "milestone" (not to be confused with "development"
or "implementation") in 2006. What this meant was not
immediately obvious.
Reacting to the 'plan',
our Campaign Director Brian Hart said: "It's important that
people are not discouraged by documents like this. Unfortunately
we have long discounted the SRA as a driving force for a rail
revival here or anywhere else."
Instead, said Mr Hart,
the campaign was actively pursuing more promising avenues, working
closely with local authorities and MPs. "We have found a
real commitment to this project across the South East region -
and during 2002 we will be working transform this into concrete
plans."
12 January - Bus link reprieved
The threatened bus link
between Uckfield and Lewes railway stations has been reprieved.
Following numerous calls for the service to be saved, Govia has
pledged to replace the present Connex-operated service with an
equivalent one, on which rail tickets will continue to be valid.
5 January 2002 - Govt rail
plans flounder - again
Government plans to increase
rail passenger traffic by 50% over the next ten years have been
undermined only a few days after they were made, with warnings
from Railtrack that putting more trains on an already overstretched
network could undermine safety. Campaign Director Brian Hart said:
"Ministers still don't seem to realise that if they want
to run more trains they must create new capacity. Locally, the
Brighton line is already struggling to cope with existing traffic;
only the Wealden Line, which would create two new routes
to London, offers any prospect of better train services."