The Charge of the Scots Greys



Unit 1
Painting War
Scotland for Ever
Geoff Dyer on Gassed
The Charge of the Light Brigade
William Howell Russell's report
in 'The Times'

Dulce et Decorum Est
Baron Gros and Matthew Brady
Dyer on War Photos

Unit 2

 

 



 

 

LadyButler was the wife of a general as well as a popular Victorian painter. She persuaded the commanding officer of the regiment to reconstruct the charge, as she stood in front of them with her easel. Nevertheless her painting cannot be accurate: thehorses are depicted as moving far too quickly (John Keegan estimates that 20 mph would soon lead to a break-up of the line); and far too close together (the horses in this detail are clearly headed towards a collision)

To what degree do these departures from strict 'realism' invalidate the painting?

 

 

This is how the charge ended: a staff officer present at the scene later wrote - 'Our men were out of hand. Every officer within hearing exerted themselves to the utmost to reform the men; but the helplessness of the enemy offered too great a temptation to the Dragoons, and our efforts were abortive. It was evident that [the French] reserves of cavalry would soon take advantage of our disorder.....we could effect no formation, and were as helpless against their attack as their infantry had been against ours. Everyone saw what must happen. Those whose horses were best, or least blown, got away. [Most of the rest] fell into the hands of the enemy..It was in this part of the transaction that almost the whole of the loss of the Brigade took place.' (quoted in Keegan: The Face of Battle)

Does this military disaster (what would happen after this moment)invalidate the painting?