I've written recently about two
concerns.
1. I am concerned about our move towards
becoming the Non-religious Society of Friends (Quakers)
in Britain and
2. I'm concerned about Trustees
running our Area Meetings.
(3. Another lost cause! Once
the Governing Documents are agreed and registered
with the Charity Commission it will be like
moving mountains to get "Monthly Meeting" changed to
"Area Meeting".)
Now I'd like to show how these two concerns are
linked. If I was dead set on resisting the move to
a non-theistic society I would not draw attention
to this, in case Friends accepted what I have to
say.
The Governing Document of Monthly Meetings
requires the Trustees to ensure the MM carries out its
"Objects". Moreover there is a clause that this
cannot be amended. (I believe I read that this is so. But now I cannot find the reference. Maybe it is just the general law that a charity cannot radically alter it stated Purpose.)
The listed Powers of the Trustees include "To do
any other lawful thing that is necessary or
desirable for the achievement of the objects of the
MM". (My understanding is that this is as discerned
by the Trustees - not by the MM in session)
So what are the "objects of the MM"? Actually there's
only one. "...the furtherance of the general
religious ... purposes of the Religious Society of
Friends (Quakers) in Britain...".
So, how are these religious purposes defined?
Answer: by reference to what we generally call
"Quaker Faith and Practice". Our faith and our
practice might change over time - the book is revised
every 25 years or so to reflect that f & p - not to
repeat a creed.
But the Charity Commission have persuaded our Quaker Stewardship
Committee to revise the Governing Document to
refer frequently to it as our "Book of Christian
Discipline" (mentioning 'currently "Quaker Faith and
Practice"). In other words to say the ultimate is not
something that merely tells the reader what our
faith and our practice are nowadays but to
specifically emphasise our Christian Discipline.
So, can we accept that we simply will not be
allowed to become non-theists? That Trustees, running
our meetings, will have a legal duty to further
our Religious Christianity whatever a MM might
wish?
If someone with a brighter brain than mine can find a flaw in my line of
reasoning in this I'd genuinely be very relieved.
I object to the move to non-theism but I accept
it is similar to other moves, to evangelicalism c
1850, to service not mission c 1900, to
non-christocentrism c 1950. It could be that the Spirit is
moving us that way, despite the reactionary
writings of curmudgeons like me. That so
long as we follow our practice of silent
'worship' the Spirit guides us even when we reject its
very existence.
But I cannot go willingly into a situation where the Charity Commission may forbid us from moved away from a prescribed purpose.
I will be prevented from attending YM. I
earnestly hope someone will be moved to speak there of
this concern.
Return to Values
Religion / Spiritual Index
Return to Blog Home Page (If that's where you came from)
Go to Blog Home Page (If you've just arrived on this site)