Short S.29 Stirling |
||
Specification B.12/36 and the Stirling |
next | |
|
Shorts Stirling hold many records- the first 4-engined
monoplane bomber of W.W.II, the the first designed from the outset with
4 engines and the first to be withdrawn from service. The design provided
good service during the first part of the war - especially after Britain
had proven its will to fight after the Battle of Britain. After paving
the way for the Halifax & Lancaster it became a victim of the latter's
success. Once the Halifax& Lancaster were online, the Stirling's problems
became more apparent. Mainly it's altitude ceiling and top speed were
limited, as was its ability to carry the latest ordinance. The losses
sustained to Flak were higher than the latter rivals, so missions were
tailored to suit - mining ("Gardening") and glider towing became
its final role before retirement. Through political uncertainty in '39- nobody could have
really known how monumental the threat would become. The specification
was further hamstrung in other ways- the plane should be capable of carrying
100 soldiers, could be transported by train - in pieces that can be readily
reassembled. The solution to the various conflicting requirements of the specification was sought by Shorts - an experienced flying boat designer- who used the basic wing design of the Sunderland Flying boat, (which itself was an extremely hardy and capable submarine hunter- with long the long range essential for the role. The resulting machine is immediately striking - mainly due to it's height standing on it's wheels - the pilot sat 22ft 9in from the ground! In flight it looks long and lanky in the fuselage with relatively stubby wings. On first seeing the posture of the plane on the ground the nose high pitch must look rather odd- there is plenty of propellor clearance (few ground crews were killed by walking into the spinning props as with other planes- especially the Liberator)- so why those very long& fragile legs? To meet the requirement for a short takeoff the plane
had to be able to jerk its nose upward at the end of the run to clear
the runway end, it had to be able to do this without stalling - so the
short wing's aerofoil was very thick, and the flaps very long in chord.
The first factors limited the maximum altitude- to a level that suited
the Flak gunners. |
||
| PLANS |
![]() |
|
| I have to admit misgivings about this machine from the early days I decided to investigate it. It lacks the glamour of it's successors. However my motivation is sustained not by any financial gain but-by curiosity. It is like a puzzle that needs solving, almost an intellectual exercise. The design does(in my view) have a romance that is quite different to that of the Lancaster. It harks back to the days when the monoplane was the latest innovation- a time that designers spawned the Whitley, the Hampton and the Hendon bombers. Lancasters get all the press, but they only built upon the expertise learned on their forebears. Night bombing had to be learned somewhere, dealing with navigation, radar and worst of all in those harsh winters of the early '40s- ice. | ||
| next->>> the undercarriage>> Video >> | ||
|
References |
||
| Tutorials | 3D aircraft |